<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: emacs and vim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noahsmark.com/2008/08/21/emacs-and-vim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noahsmark.com/2008/08/21/emacs-and-vim/</link>
	<description>[witty tagline]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vimpulse-user</title>
		<link>http://noahsmark.com/2008/08/21/emacs-and-vim/comment-page-1/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Vimpulse-user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noahsmark.com/?p=209#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything you just said.  I used Emacs for many years,
and I&#039;m pretty damn good at it.  However, after I finally broke down
and tried vim for a few months, I really think that modal keybindings
are much cleaner and faster than Emacs-style ones.

Anyway, my current solution is to use vim for quick edits, and Emacs +
viper + vimpulse.el for good vim keybindings in Emacs.  This works really
well, and I think this is basically the ideal setup.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything you just said.  I used Emacs for many years,<br />
and I&#8217;m pretty damn good at it.  However, after I finally broke down<br />
and tried vim for a few months, I really think that modal keybindings<br />
are much cleaner and faster than Emacs-style ones.</p>
<p>Anyway, my current solution is to use vim for quick edits, and Emacs +<br />
viper + vimpulse.el for good vim keybindings in Emacs.  This works really<br />
well, and I think this is basically the ideal setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vimpulse-user</title>
		<link>http://noahsmark.com/2008/08/21/emacs-and-vim/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>Vimpulse-user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noahsmark.com/?p=209#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything you just said.  I used Emacs for many years,&lt;br&gt;and I&#039;m pretty damn good at it.  However, after I finally broke down&lt;br&gt;and tried vim for a few months, I really think that modal keybindings&lt;br&gt;are much cleaner and faster than Emacs-style ones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, my current solution is to use vim for quick edits, and Emacs +&lt;br&gt;viper + vimpulse.el for good vim keybindings in Emacs.  This works really&lt;br&gt;well, and I think this is basically the ideal setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything you just said.  I used Emacs for many years,<br />and I&#39;m pretty damn good at it.  However, after I finally broke down<br />and tried vim for a few months, I really think that modal keybindings<br />are much cleaner and faster than Emacs-style ones.</p>
<p>Anyway, my current solution is to use vim for quick edits, and Emacs +<br />viper + vimpulse.el for good vim keybindings in Emacs.  This works really<br />well, and I think this is basically the ideal setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

