<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a new test for idiocy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noahsmark.com/2009/03/04/a-new-test-for-idiocy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noahsmark.com/2009/03/04/a-new-test-for-idiocy/</link>
	<description>[witty tagline]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:10:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: allergies_cures</title>
		<link>http://noahsmark.com/2009/03/04/a-new-test-for-idiocy/comment-page-1/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>allergies_cures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noahsmark.com/?p=256#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>Please give me more information. I love it, Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please give me more information. I love it, Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://noahsmark.com/2009/03/04/a-new-test-for-idiocy/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noahsmark.com/?p=256#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>Wow.   Nicely put, with a humane understanding of the desperation many parents of autistic children feel.  I can&#039;t fault anything in your post.  I would add there is a case to be made against some vaccines that is resolutely pro-science and makes no claims whatever regarding autism.  Some drugs are effective, some are not.  Some have significant side effects, some don&#039;t.  Many family medicine docs don&#039;t have time to weigh the pros and cons, or review the actual studies for everything on the vaccination schedule.  They can be forgiven for listening to drug reps who sound sciency.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The science shows that immunity from vaccination is often less comprehensive and doesn&#039;t last as long as that from exposure to live, wild viruses.  I will accept that, and happily, in the case of tetanus, but not in the case of chicken pox.   There are some vaccines where we opted out.  In our judgement, after a review of the peer-reviewed literature, in some cases the risks outweighed the effectiveness-weighted benefits.  In cases where eradication was in the cards (polio), we opted in regardless of risk.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think Big Pharma (not a weasel word - they call themselves that) does some evil shit.  Lobbying against universal health care coverage; looting the treasury via lobbying in the recent Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act; spending orders of magnitude more on advertising than on research and development; retiring safe, effective drugs in favor of new ones whose sole advantage is unexpired patents; and so on.  Most of the big ones have been caught keeping unsafe drugs on the market, and doctoring tests during the approval process.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This view of the industry has little to do with science, an approach to knowing shit we both follow.  It has a lot to do with douches, some of whom are polluting what is really a crazy cool technology.  &quot;Here: this stuff cures you.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.   Nicely put, with a humane understanding of the desperation many parents of autistic children feel.  I can&#39;t fault anything in your post.  I would add there is a case to be made against some vaccines that is resolutely pro-science and makes no claims whatever regarding autism.  Some drugs are effective, some are not.  Some have significant side effects, some don&#39;t.  Many family medicine docs don&#39;t have time to weigh the pros and cons, or review the actual studies for everything on the vaccination schedule.  They can be forgiven for listening to drug reps who sound sciency.  </p>
<p>The science shows that immunity from vaccination is often less comprehensive and doesn&#39;t last as long as that from exposure to live, wild viruses.  I will accept that, and happily, in the case of tetanus, but not in the case of chicken pox.   There are some vaccines where we opted out.  In our judgement, after a review of the peer-reviewed literature, in some cases the risks outweighed the effectiveness-weighted benefits.  In cases where eradication was in the cards (polio), we opted in regardless of risk.  </p>
<p>I do think Big Pharma (not a weasel word &#8211; they call themselves that) does some evil shit.  Lobbying against universal health care coverage; looting the treasury via lobbying in the recent Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act; spending orders of magnitude more on advertising than on research and development; retiring safe, effective drugs in favor of new ones whose sole advantage is unexpired patents; and so on.  Most of the big ones have been caught keeping unsafe drugs on the market, and doctoring tests during the approval process.   </p>
<p>This view of the industry has little to do with science, an approach to knowing shit we both follow.  It has a lot to do with douches, some of whom are polluting what is really a crazy cool technology.  &#8220;Here: this stuff cures you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homoeopathic treatment</title>
		<link>http://noahsmark.com/2009/03/04/a-new-test-for-idiocy/comment-page-1/#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>homoeopathic treatment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noahsmark.com/?p=256#comment-1168</guid>
		<description>I like your website. You are the first person I have seen who is going ahead with simple straight forward wordpress template.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your website. You are the first person I have seen who is going ahead with simple straight forward wordpress template.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
